Blog

Posts Tagged ‘sacramento bee’

California Foreclosure Crisis Subsides

Wednesday, May 26th, 2010

Sacramento April home sales prices increase from year earlier

Tuesday, May 25th, 2010

Foreclosures’ collateral damage widespread

Friday, February 12th, 2010

If you’re among the thousands of Sacramento-area homeowners who played it conservative during the housing boom, who didn’t refinance or flip to a bigger house, everyone else’s foreclosures reached out and smacked you anyway.

Sales prices are lower. There’s less home equity to tap into. Local services have been shredded by falling property tax revenue.

Such repo collateral damage is why so many owners who pay their mortgages on time are so grouchy.

Rob Wassmer hasn’t been affected so much. Fourteen years ago he bought an east Sacramento house – in the Fab 40s – cheaply at the very bottom of the last housing bust. His older neighborhood has largely escaped the brunt of 52,000 foreclosures across the Sacramento region since 2007.

But Wassmer knows the financial whipping people have taken in Lincoln, Elk Grove, North Highlands and Yuba City. Being an academic, he knew there had to be a number for the carnage.

“I knew this kind of research had been done. I wanted to do a study of Sacramento,” said Wassmer, chairman of California State University, Sacramento’s department of public policy and administration.

Wassmer analyzed $9 billion in sales prices from 36,822 home sales in Sacramento, Yolo, Yuba, Sutter, Placer and El Dorado counties between January 2008 and June 2009. Almost half were homes sold by banks. The other half were sold by regular folks.

He concluded that the foreclosed homes cost this one region of America $2.7 billion in price cuts and lost equity over just 18 months.

• The repos sold for $659 million less simply because they were bank-owned and differed from normal sales. They took $1 billion more in price cuts because they were near other repos.

• Both reductions then stripped $1 billion from sale prices of nearby homes never in foreclosure danger.

Collectively, these foreclosures cost local governments $27.1 million in property taxes. Reassessments will likely take more.

Said Wassmer, “This is a call for regulation.” He suggests a federal law to make lenders and borrowers meet in “structured mediation” at least once before foreclosure.

Few ideas have proved so far to be the solution. See the research directly at: >www.csus.edu/indiv/w/wassmerr/ResForeclosure.pdf

Home sales gravity: Higher-end prices in capital area can drop farther

Friday, October 23rd, 2009

After years of falling values and a massive sell-off of foreclosed homes in the Sacramento region, it’s easier now to believe real estate agents when they say the market has bottomed out.

But wait. That’s the lower end, houses priced at roughly $300,000 and under, the zone of repos and bidding wars between investors and first-time buyers.

The higher end of the Sacramento-area market – say anywhere from $500,000 to $1 million or more – still has ample room to fall unless this economy surprisingly rebounds. So owners are whacking harder now on initial asking prices.

You can see that in new statistics from home search firm Trulia.com. The company says homeowners with listings in El Dorado, Placer, Sacramento and Yolo County have collectively reduced asking prices by $156 million since putting out for-sale signs.

About 40 percent of that markdown is from homes priced at $1 million or more. On average, these richest owners have cut their prices by $271,000 in El Dorado County, and $334,000 in Placer County.

Up in the real estate heights, it remains more expensive for buyers to get financing. The move-up buyer pool is smaller than ever as thousands at the lower- and mid-market have seen their equity shredded.

Those who can buy at higher prices are savvy and watching for capitulation, meaning “price reductions and opportunity,” said Bob Bronswick, head of Coldwell Banker’s residential brokerage for the Sacramento and Lake Tahoe region. For owners, it’s all about what Bronswick and others in the trade call “getting a little more realistic.”

Bronswick said the higher end is a little stronger than a year ago. Yet numbers from the Sacramento Association of Realtors show just 2.9 percent of October’s buyers paid $500,000 or more in Sacramento County and West Sacramento. At today’s pace, it would take two years to sell the houses in SAR’s territory priced at $650,000 or more, said association President Charlene Singley. The market as a whole has a much smaller inventory of unsold homes – just 3.2 months worth.

This story is repeated all over California. There’s a market for it still,” Bronswick said of higher-end homes. “But it’s a little bit softer.” In a business where no one likes to be negative, and inside an economy that hasn’t got its act together yet, that’s probably putting it – well, softly.

 

Rents headed down again

 

While we’re speaking of deflationary real estate, area apartment rents have returned to late 2006 levels. That’s after a yearlong slide that continued in July, August and September, Novato-based industry tracker RealFacts reported this week.

No wonder capital apartment complexes are offering “two-bedroom blowouts” or a four-bedroom lease for the price of two bedrooms.

RealFacts pegged average third-quarter rent at $946 for 76,000 apartment units in El Dorado, Placer, Sacramento and Yolo counties. That’s down from $974 a year ago. The average two-bedroom, two-bath unit goes for $1,062, said the firm.

Rents at large apartment communities are falling in tandem with higher vacancies as more people who have lost their jobs double up, live at home or rent houses from people unable to sell them.

Average monthly apartment rents and occupancy rates in capital-area cities:

• Davis: $1,354; 96.4 percent.

• Elk Grove: $1,098; 88.9 percent.

• Folsom: $1,138; 90.4 percent.

Rancho Cordova: $814; 93.5 percent.

• Rocklin: $1,047; 93 percent.

• Roseville: $1,066; 92.9 percent.

• Sacramento: $929; 92.4 percent.

Horror stories about servicers from a front-line loan counselor

Saturday, October 10th, 2009

Home Front

Dropped phone calls, lost materials, different stories from different people, chaos and confusion inside the cubicles of mortgage services. It isn’t often we get such a revealing and candid view from the front lines of nonprofit loan counseling about dealing with loan servicers. But

here now is an astonishing inside look from Manny Randhawa, housing counselor for the California Senior Legal Hotline in Sacramento. (Don’t be distracted by the deleted markings in the piece; the text is all there).

 Randhawa recently wrote it as an op-ed piece.
The chaotic nature of what he deals with is his opinion and based entirely on his own experiences. We have not sought feedback from the institutions he mentions.

But I can say that his experiences match the tortured stories I have been hearing generally from borrowers – and some counselors – for well over two years. Home Front has to speculate that what Randhawa explains above is among the many reasons this California economy is in its current state, and a key factor in the high numbers of foreclosures.

Expected Wave of Sacramento Foreclosures Only a Trickle

Tuesday, October 6th, 2009

 

SACRAMENTO, CA – Sacramento’s home prices are projected to drop 15.7 percent for the year, but that’s good news. Other counties are expected to fall 19 percent to 20 percent.

Much of Sacramento’s good fortune is due to the lack of foreclosures actually hitting the market. Banks are holding on to thousands of foreclosed properties in the Sacramento region. But, they are coming on the market in dribbles. So slowly, they are snatched up in a few days. That kind of demand is pushing up the price of homes that are $300,000 and under.

What was expected to be a flood of foreclosures is turning out to be a trickle. Michael Lyon of Lyon Real Estate agreed.

“Now that we’ve talked to the banks and found out what’s going on, they don’t have the personnel to do the processing to get it out,” Lyon said.

Lyon said the federal government has put heavy restrictions on banks that took bailout money when it comes to following through on foreclosures.

“There’s too much of a bureaucratic mess to really throw these things out on the streets so they’re coming in at a rather absorbable rate, which is keeping that low end, under $300,000,” said Lyon. “It’s becoming a seller’s market. I didn’t think I would be saying this for years.”

Lyon predicts that instead of seeing a wave of foreclosures sweep in over the next few months, it will likely now be a steady stream over the next few years.

—————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————–

California selling buildings worth $2 billion to raise cash

Thursday, September 24th, 2009

 

As the California economy roared in the 1990s and tax revenues poured into a treasury overseen by Gov. Pete Wilson, the state laid plans for a series of new office buildings in Sacramento to spare itself from paying rent to other landlords.

Barely a decade later, the Schwarzenegger administration is launching a process to sell many of the same buildings that were originally touted as long-term money savers for taxpayers. The goal today is more immediate: pay off debt and steer cash into the state’s depleted general fund. It’s among a variety of short-term crisis solutions that include selling surplus state property, moves also being undertaken in cash-strapped Arizona.

In California, 11 state-owned sites with an estimated value of almost $2 billion will be listed for sale in early 2010 to pay off about $1.4 billion in bonds and net another $600 million “to support other critical state government programs,” said state Department of General Services spokesman Eric Lamoureux.

The state wouldn’t move out of the buildings; it would continue to lease them from the new owners.

The sell-off has lit up the skies for brokers in an otherwise downcast office real estate sector, where few buildings are being bought, sold or even listed, especially in Sacramento. It’s likewise called fresh attention to the state’s battered finances and stirred banter about whether it’s smart to sell long-term real estate assets for short-term goals in a weak market.

Many in the real estate industry acknowledge it’s a close call, but believe “beautiful class A” state buildings with a single tenant will command premium prices.

“It’s unfortunate they would sell them. But they definitely have a need for financing right now, for equity to solve this budget crisis,” said Tom Aguer, president of Sacramento-based commercial real estate brokers Aguer Havelock Associates. “It’s a very creative way for them to fix their problem. But in the long term, these are great assets.”

Brokers like Aguer and others among the nation’s leading real estate firms are already assembling proposals and lining up national teams to broker the sales. The state is demanding an experienced partner: a firm that has done five separate deals of $20 million or more in the past seven years, and at least $150 million in total deals in that span.

No one can calculate for certain the fees such a deal could bring a brokerage firm. But it’s widely said in the industry that the higher the price, the lower the commission. Even a commission as low as one-quarter of 1 percent of almost $2 billion in sales could net a firm nearly $5 million.

Specifically, the state is proposing a so-called “sale/leaseback” deal in which buyers of state buildings would rent them to the state afterward.

“We intend to maintain 100 percent occupancy in the buildings just as we have today,” said Lamoureux, whose department manages state buildings. “We’re just looking to sell the property and lease back over an extended term, probably along the line of 20 years or so.”

Brokers say the lease-back provision is likely to stir interest among risk-averse investors known in the trade as “coupon clippers.” Those are big institutional investors such as pension funds and insurance companies.

“There are numerous buyers looking for single-tenant buildings with the long-term leases. It’s a steady income. It’s a low-risk deal,” said Nico Coulouras, vice president in Sacramento for Lowe Enterprises, a Los Angeles-based development and investment firm.

Among the state complexes proposed for sale are some of Sacramento’s biggest buildings and most distinctive landmarks: downtown’s massive East End Complex next to Capitol Park, finished in 2003; the 17-story Attorney General Building on I Street, completed in 1995; and the sprawling 1.8 million-square-foot campus of the Franchise Tax Board, expanded earlier this decade at the city’s eastern edge.

Elsewhere, fixtures of the Oakland, San Francisco and Los Angeles skylines – bearing names of politicians from Ronald Reagan to Hiram Johnson – will also be sold.

Lennar falls deeper into red

Monday, September 21st, 2009

Signs that the housing market is gaining traction have yet to pull Lennar Corp., one of the nation’s largest homebuilders, out of the red.

The Miami-based homebuilder (NYSE: LEN and NYSE: LEN-B) said it lost $171.6 million, or 97 cents a share, on revenue of $720.7 million for the third quarter ended Aug. 31. A year ago, it reported a net loss of $89 million, or 56 cents a share, on revenue of $1.11 billion.

The third quarter results included write-downs totaling 76 cents a share.

Analysts polled by Thomson Reuters expected a 46-cent loss on revenue of $774 million.

Lennar was the area’s fifth-largest homebuilder in 2008, selling 277 homes in the six-county Sacramento region with a 5.7 percent market share, according to analyst Hanley Wood Market Intelligence.

Lennar president and chief executive officer Stuart Miller said the overall housing market is on the “road to recovery.”

“While high unemployment and foreclosures will continue to present challenges, consumer sentiment has significantly improved as homebuyers have recognized that the residential housing market is stabilizing,” he said.

Miller said the company’s strategy is to target first-time buyers and bargain-hunters, which are helping new home orders rise each month. New orders were still down 8 percent in the third quarter, but that decline was the smallest percentage year-over-year decline since November 2006.

“In order to capitalize on the improvement in our sales pace, we increased our home starts during the quarter, which will lead to higher deliveries in the fourth quarter,” Miller said. “We are also encouraged by the continued improvement in our cancellation rate.”

The cancellation rate dropped to 19 percent from 27 percent, gross margin on home sales shrunk to 15.6 percent ($98.9 million) from 18 percent ($179.4 million).

Third-quarter home sales revenue in the third quarter decreased 36 percent, to $635.3 million from nearly $1 billion in 2008. The drop was mostly due to a 28 percent decrease in home deliveries and a 12 percent decrease in the average sales price of homes delivered.

Year-over-year, the average sales price was down by $30,000 – to $239,000.

California unemployment: 12.2 percent

Friday, September 18th, 2009

The state’s unemployment rate rose three-tenths of a point in August, to 12.2 percent, state officials said today.

Sacramento-area unemployment hit 12 percent, up slightly from a revised 11.9 percent the month before, the state Employment Development Department said.

But there was some good news: Payroll jobs fell statewide by only 12,300, suggesting an easing of the recession. That was only one third as many jobs as were lost in July, and the lowest toll in more than a year.

The Sacramento region lost 1,700 jobs during the month, or about one-fourth the job loss recorded in July.

“This moderation (in job loss) looks to me like we’re going to have job growth pretty quickly here in California,” said Howard Roth, chief economist at the state Department of Finance.

But he added that the August jobs report got a seasonal boost of sorts: With the school year starting so early in many districts, education payrolls swelled more than usual.

And even as layoffs taper off, the unemployment rate will keep going up for a while as Californians resume looking for work, he said.

“I think we’re on the road to recovery,” said Stephen Levy of the Center for Continuing Study of the California Economy. But he acknowledged that continued job loss, however small, will leave many Californians skeptical that the situation is improving. “There’s a reason people don’t think the recession is ending,” he said.

Michael Bernick, a former director of the EDD, said that although layoffs are slowing, “there’s been no uptick in terms of hiring.”

Tags: recession

wow..$10M in stimulus funds for empty downtown senior high-rise

Wednesday, September 16th, 2009

Federal stimulus funding is bringing $10 million to restore an empty residential high-rise at 7th and I streets in downtown Sacramento.

“We were high-fiving each other. It’s not every day you get $10 million in a competitive grant project,” said Nick Chhotu, director of public housing at the Sacramento Housing and Redevelopment Agency. The money is headed toward a thorough facelift for the 12-story Riverview Apartments owned by SHRA. It’s a senior complex built in the late 1970s at 626 I St. The building has been empty two years.

Plans are to start construction late next year after getting up to $6 million more in federal funds. The building, with 108 rooms for people 62 and older, needs new windows, a new electrical system and new plumbing, a job that will run well into 2011, said Chhotu.

The Public Housing Capital funds are provided through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. The agency said Sacramento’s $10 million is among the largest grants nationally, and one of two on the West Coast. The other: Seattle.

Here is the building everyone is talking about: