For once California’s economy looks good compared to that of some other states.

A foreclosure crisis that has dimmed the state’s golden glow with images of financial ruin and broken government is beginning to wane, says a leading trade group for the U.S. mortgage industry.

The Mortgage Bankers Association said Wednesday that California foreclosure starts have fallen from a year ago – even as problems grow in Midwestern Rust Belt states such as Ohio, Michigan, Indiana and Illinois.

“California is showing signs of improvement. We are seeing it on a quarter-to-quarter basis and year-over-year basis,” MBA Chief Economist Jay Brinkmann said.

Consider:

• In the past year California moved from fourth place among U.S. states for foreclosure starts to seventh.

• Mortgage delinquencies, while up from early 2009, fell slightly in early 2010.

• The percentage of California mortgages in the foreclosure process fell, too, during the past year.

California’s fragile improvements come as the national picture is less clear. Collectively, the longtime mortgage disaster areas – Florida, California, Arizona and Nevada – are becoming less of a problem nationally, MBA data showed.

“A year ago they had 45.3 percent of the problem loans,” said Brinkmann. “That’s down to 37.9 percent.

“We’re looking now at Illinois, Ohio, Michigan and Indiana. They’re climbing back into the list of problems,” he said. Those states have longer-term structural problems as their manufacturing economies continue to decline.

The new data confirmed improvements in California and the Sacramento area recently cited by researcher MDA DataQuick. Last month the firm said mortgage defaults have fallen for a year straight in the state and region, with foreclosures dropping now as well.

In hard-hit Sacramento suburbs such as Natomas, Lincoln and Elk Grove, residents see dwindling evidence of the crisis.

“All those houses that were vacant before were sold in the last year or two,” said Tyler Smith, a Keller Williams agent in Sacramento “A year ago it seemed every other house on some of those streets were vacant.”

Homeowners in distress are increasingly using short sales to unload their properties rather than losing them to foreclosure.

That’s helping preserve neighborhoods, because these owners stay in the homes until they’re sold rather being evicted and leaving an empty house behind.

Make no mistake: California’s long journey into a financial meltdown is nowhere near its conclusion, economists say.

They foresee prolonged trouble for the state economy and government revenues. At best, said Los Angeles economist Chris Thornberg, “The worst is behind us.” He added, “We have years yet of dealing with this.”

Like everything about the foreclosure crisis, even explaining a sense of improvement is open to interpretation. Thornberg said a fall in California foreclosure starts shows only that banks are taking longer to deal with late mortgage payments.

Jeff Michael, director of the Business Forecasting Center at the University of the Pacific, said simply, “This suggests we’ve reached the point where the number moving into delinquency equals the number moving out.”

Even that might be declared victory. More people are moving out of delinquency through short sales – selling their homes for less than they owe. And despite criticism of government loan modification efforts, the U.S. Treasury Department reported this week that 5,400 homeowners in the eight-county Sacramento region received permanent loan modifications since December 2009. Regionally, banks foreclosed on 4,300 more in the first quarter of 2010.

Any slowdown of last year’s frightful rise in delinquencies, said Michael, “indicates we’re close to a peak.”

The state still has a long way to go before it regains a healthy economy, 6 percent unemployment and a budget in the black, Thornberg and Michael agreed Wednesday. But for once, California is falling off lists of the worst performers.

Eventually, the supply of distressed properties will simply be exhausted, Michael said, adding, “The fire will burn itself out for lack of fuel.”

More people bought pricier houses in April, signaling the end of Sacramento’s bargain basement-only sales scene.

Buyers picked up the pace from last year in Granite Bay, El Dorado Hills and older neighborhoods near downtown Sacramento, researcher MDA DataQuick reported Thursday. Simultaneously, buyers dwindled in Oak Park, North Highlands and other repo zones of the past two years.

What gives?

There are fewer available repos after a long blowout sale, market trackers say. There’s also a sense at the higher end that this market is as good as it’s going to get for a while.

He said he sold three houses this week valued between $350,000 and $800,000.

The shifting sales mix tugged Sacramento County’s median sales price for resale houses nearly 10 percent higher than the same time last year, DataQuick reported. The median, where half cost more and half less, was $175,000.

Resale home prices also beat April 2009 levels in Placer, Sutter, Yolo and Yuba counties.

Less than half of Sacramento County’s April sales were cheap bank repos – compared with two-thirds a year earlier. With fewer repos this year, sales in the $200,000 to $400,000 range grabbed a larger market share.

“We’ve had 70 people coming through open houses in the $300,000 to $400,000 range,” said Bob Bronswick, president of Coldwell Banker Residential Brokerage in Sacramento and Lake Tahoe.

“That’s the trend across the state,” said DataQuick analyst Andrew LePage. He said sellers are cutting prices and buyers are still getting low interest rates to make deals work.

Sellers are not thinking about 2005. They’re thinking: ‘We might have to take it back to 2003 or 2002 prices and sell it at that.’

This doesn’t mean expensive is back. LePage said homes priced above $400,000 are only a tiny percentage of Sacramento-area sales.

But the shift is part of restoring balance to a market where repos accounted for a majority of sales for much of 2008 and 2009. Banks have cut repossessed homes on the market.

“The way banks are managing it now will probably keep prices from falling much further,” said Rick Sharga of Orange County foreclosure analyst RealtyTrac.

Overall, 3,255 homes changed hands during April in Amador, El Dorado, Nevada, Placer, Sacramento, Sutter, Yolo and Yuba counties, DataQuick reported. That was down slightly from March – and fewer than April 2009.

Analysts attributed the slight drop to fewer repo listings for first-time buyers and people delaying escrow closings until May. The state began offering homebuyer tax credits of up to $10,000 May 1.

New homes accounted for 5 percent of sales in the region.

Sales prices are lower. There’s less home equity to tap into. Local services have been shredded by falling property tax revenue.

Such repo collateral damage is why so many owners who pay their mortgages on time are so grouchy.

Rob Wassmer hasn’t been affected so much. Fourteen years ago he bought an east Sacramento house – in the Fab 40s – cheaply at the very bottom of the last housing bust. His older neighborhood has largely escaped the brunt of 52,000 foreclosures across the Sacramento region since 2007.

But Wassmer knows the financial whipping people have taken in Lincoln, Elk Grove, North Highlands and Yuba City. Being an academic, he knew there had to be a number for the carnage.

“I knew this kind of research had been done. I wanted to do a study of Sacramento,” said Wassmer, chairman of California State University, Sacramento’s department of public policy and administration.

Wassmer analyzed $9 billion in sales prices from 36,822 home sales in Sacramento, Yolo, Yuba, Sutter, Placer and El Dorado counties between January 2008 and June 2009. Almost half were homes sold by banks. The other half were sold by regular folks.

He concluded that the foreclosed homes cost this one region of America $2.7 billion in price cuts and lost equity over just 18 months.

• The repos sold for $659 million less simply because they were bank-owned and differed from normal sales. They took $1 billion more in price cuts because they were near other repos.

• Both reductions then stripped $1 billion from sale prices of nearby homes never in foreclosure danger.

Collectively, these foreclosures cost local governments $27.1 million in property taxes. Reassessments will likely take more.

Said Wassmer, “This is a call for regulation.” He suggests a federal law to make lenders and borrowers meet in “structured mediation” at least once before foreclosure.

Few ideas have proved so far to be the solution. See the research directly at: >www.csus.edu/indiv/w/wassmerr/ResForeclosure.pdf

 Thanks to all my workers here at the office, without them we could of not made this happen. Thanks to all the banks we service that trust us to service them. We all look forward to next month. Thank you!

SACRAMENTO, CA – Sacramento’s home prices are projected to drop 15.7 percent for the year, but that’s good news. Other counties are expected to fall 19 percent to 20 percent.

Much of Sacramento’s good fortune is due to the lack of foreclosures actually hitting the market. Banks are holding on to thousands of foreclosed properties in the Sacramento region. But, they are coming on the market in dribbles. So slowly, they are snatched up in a few days. That kind of demand is pushing up the price of homes that are $300,000 and under.

What was expected to be a flood of foreclosures is turning out to be a trickle. Michael Lyon of Lyon Real Estate agreed.

“Now that we’ve talked to the banks and found out what’s going on, they don’t have the personnel to do the processing to get it out,” Lyon said.

Lyon said the federal government has put heavy restrictions on banks that took bailout money when it comes to following through on foreclosures.

“There’s too much of a bureaucratic mess to really throw these things out on the streets so they’re coming in at a rather absorbable rate, which is keeping that low end, under $300,000,” said Lyon. “It’s becoming a seller’s market. I didn’t think I would be saying this for years.”

Lyon predicts that instead of seeing a wave of foreclosures sweep in over the next few months, it will likely now be a steady stream over the next few years.

—————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————–

CCUL, which is headquartered in Ontario and has an office in Sacramento, said California credit unions originated more than $7.3 billion in loans in the second quarter, up from $7.1 billion in this year’s first quarter.

The league also noted that Sacramento County credit unions saw money market shares gain more than $207 million, or 7.8 percent, in the second quarter, while regular savings and checking accounts had gains of less than 1 percent.

As the California economy roared in the 1990s and tax revenues poured into a treasury overseen by Gov. Pete Wilson, the state laid plans for a series of new office buildings in Sacramento to spare itself from paying rent to other landlords.

Barely a decade later, the Schwarzenegger administration is launching a process to sell many of the same buildings that were originally touted as long-term money savers for taxpayers. The goal today is more immediate: pay off debt and steer cash into the state’s depleted general fund. It’s among a variety of short-term crisis solutions that include selling surplus state property, moves also being undertaken in cash-strapped Arizona.

In California, 11 state-owned sites with an estimated value of almost $2 billion will be listed for sale in early 2010 to pay off about $1.4 billion in bonds and net another $600 million “to support other critical state government programs,” said state Department of General Services spokesman Eric Lamoureux.

The state wouldn’t move out of the buildings; it would continue to lease them from the new owners.

The sell-off has lit up the skies for brokers in an otherwise downcast office real estate sector, where few buildings are being bought, sold or even listed, especially in Sacramento. It’s likewise called fresh attention to the state’s battered finances and stirred banter about whether it’s smart to sell long-term real estate assets for short-term goals in a weak market.

Many in the real estate industry acknowledge it’s a close call, but believe “beautiful class A” state buildings with a single tenant will command premium prices.

“It’s unfortunate they would sell them. But they definitely have a need for financing right now, for equity to solve this budget crisis,” said Tom Aguer, president of Sacramento-based commercial real estate brokers Aguer Havelock Associates. “It’s a very creative way for them to fix their problem. But in the long term, these are great assets.”

Brokers like Aguer and others among the nation’s leading real estate firms are already assembling proposals and lining up national teams to broker the sales. The state is demanding an experienced partner: a firm that has done five separate deals of $20 million or more in the past seven years, and at least $150 million in total deals in that span.

No one can calculate for certain the fees such a deal could bring a brokerage firm. But it’s widely said in the industry that the higher the price, the lower the commission. Even a commission as low as one-quarter of 1 percent of almost $2 billion in sales could net a firm nearly $5 million.

Specifically, the state is proposing a so-called “sale/leaseback” deal in which buyers of state buildings would rent them to the state afterward.

“We intend to maintain 100 percent occupancy in the buildings just as we have today,” said Lamoureux, whose department manages state buildings. “We’re just looking to sell the property and lease back over an extended term, probably along the line of 20 years or so.”

Brokers say the lease-back provision is likely to stir interest among risk-averse investors known in the trade as “coupon clippers.” Those are big institutional investors such as pension funds and insurance companies.

“There are numerous buyers looking for single-tenant buildings with the long-term leases. It’s a steady income. It’s a low-risk deal,” said Nico Coulouras, vice president in Sacramento for Lowe Enterprises, a Los Angeles-based development and investment firm.

Among the state complexes proposed for sale are some of Sacramento’s biggest buildings and most distinctive landmarks: downtown’s massive East End Complex next to Capitol Park, finished in 2003; the 17-story Attorney General Building on I Street, completed in 1995; and the sprawling 1.8 million-square-foot campus of the Franchise Tax Board, expanded earlier this decade at the city’s eastern edge.

Elsewhere, fixtures of the Oakland, San Francisco and Los Angeles skylines – bearing names of politicians from Ronald Reagan to Hiram Johnson – will also be sold.