Blog

Posts Tagged ‘interest rates’

Hanley Wood’s 209 Housing Forecast: seeing a little light now

Tuesday, September 15th, 2009

Costa Mesa-based Hanley Wood Market Intelligence held its annual Sacramento housing forecast this morning at the Doubletree – telling about 75-80 members of the region’s struggling home building industry that the signals are still mixed – and projections call for 3,400 home sales in El Dorado, Placer, Sacramento, Sutter, Yolo and Yuba counties this year. (Comparing that to a different category – housing permits issued by local governments over the year to start homes – that has to be the fewest since the late 1960s in this region).

It’s little wonder the ball room is full of shell-shocked building industry types looking for any kind of good news at all. I took notes of both speakers and will offer somewhat of a transcript here of what was said about the national home building scene first, and then the regional scene. The forum was sponsored by the Propane Education and Research Council.

(Check back a little later, we are expecting to be able to upload a PowerPoint here to go along with this)

Boyce Thompson, editorial director of Hanley Wood’s fleet of builder magazines, and editor of Big Builder Magazine, in particular, offered this national overview. (He, by the way, visited with principals of Sacramento’s Township 9 infill project and toured downtown’s successful Sutter Brownstones infill project).
 
8:06 a.m. Thompson: This is like the third or fourth time I’ve been here. My forecast is going to be decidedly optimistic here today. People are talking about W-shaped recovery..We’ve fallen so far there’s nowhere to go but up. We’ve already started up. I just feel like things are going to get better.
 Sacramento has received a lot of national press. Your land market is coming back, with lots of bids on land and that’s one of the tell-tale signs of beginning recovery. I have a way more positive presentation this year..The last three years I have been negative about the housing market.  Nationally, our fortunes are all tied to the national financial markets. We’re going to see an uneven market..Some are beginning to recover. Others are still getting worse. Chicago, of all places, still seems to be getting worse.

The recovery is going to be slow. Housing starts usually bounce back in the first two quarters after recession, don’t think it will be so much this time. We are kind of dragging along the bottom, and it looks like we’re having a little bit of a W-shaped recovery, where it bounces down and up and down.

Headwinds: We still have all that unsold inventory. We’ve got 2.2 million extra (new and built) homes that we need to burn through. And the existing home inventory remains too high. A lot of people believe this is the single biggest problem in the market. There are too many existing homes for sale. Nationally, we have a nine months supply, compared to a usual average of 6.4 months.

We expect to get double-digit unemployment by end of year nationally. But the housing market always comes back while job losses are increasing….You still have 80 percent of households in decent shape. It’s not going to take a lot of people to move that metric forward.. It’s the reason the market rebounds before the economy in general does.

The foreclosure problems: The problem is the foreclosure problem is spreading from subprime to prime. There is the danger of anther flood of foreclosures from Alt-A and Option ARM loans. But there are so many government programs now to help people with these loans. It’s hard to tell what will happen. I’m going to punt on that one.

Consumer confidence has improved.Mortgage rates are still incredibly low. We expect mortgage rates to stay in the low “fives” for the next two years as the Fed continues its policies…The other good news is the banks have loosened up somewhat. Over 70 percent in 2008 had seriously tightened credit; now they’re starting to loosen somewhat and builders have found other sources of liquidity, too, somewhat.
 
Some market are going to recover before others..Texas, the Carolinas haven’t had rampant price inflation so they haven’t had corresponding deflation.Texas and Washington, D.C., have had strong job growth. The healthiest top 10 new home markets nationally are Austin, San Antonio, Washington, D.C., Houston, Oklahoma City, Baton Rouge, Tulsa, Salt Lake City, Dallas Fort Worth and Olympia, WA..

There are four Texas markets in top 10. Baltimore, too, is a place where sales are actually up year over year. It’s an affordable market. New home sales are up 8.4 percent from January through July this year compared to last year.

Compare that to the Central Valley of California. Sales are down 48 percent from the same time last year. But at least that rate of decline is slowing now.

New home sales in Sacramento’s six-county region are down 43.7 percent this year so far from the same time last year. Riverside-San Bernardino is down just 28 percent from last year. That’s amazing.
 
There;s nobody who doesn’t see the market coming back next year. Even Economist Mark Zandi of Moodys, who is usually a bear, thinks the market will come back in second half of 2010 and be strong in 2011. On the single-family home side, the National Association of Home Builders predicts 2010 will be better than 2008 again.

And for all the trauma there are still successful projects out there that sell eight to 10 homes a month.Most are aimed at at first-time buyers.They target tax credits. The old rules of real estate still apply: a great project in a place where people really want to live. That still works.
Transit-oriented development through this downturn has always done better than the rest.

All these projects were green. Well, it’s not so much green, but energy efficiency. There’s a lot of  marketing going around green. You may think people don’t really care about it, but what’s the harm, it seems to be working for people.

Here’s some big winners nationally:

  • Mueller row and yard Homes, It’s by Catellus in east Austin. Prices start at 269K. It’s a five-minute drive from downtown.
  • TLofts in West LA. CityView is the developer. These are lofts near Santa Monica Boulevard, starting at $415K. They sold 13 in first month in July. These are condos and lofts. There are 18 parking spots where you can charge an electric car and that’s gotten a lot of media attention.
  • Paradise at Ironwood Crossing, outside of Phoenix. It’s in Pinal County and the San Tan Valley. The builder is Fulton Homes. It’s selling 21.5 per month. It starts at $115,900 to $148,900. Single family homes.
  • Ivy at Woodbury East. This is in Irvine; The developer is The Irvine Co. and the builder is  William Lyon Homes..sold 21 homes a month in July to mid August. Starting in the mid 300s. Townhomes. A lot of these places have done price cuts to boost sales.
  • Stafford Lakes: Fredericksburg, VA. Builder Centex is selling nine per month, with prices from $255K to $325. They’re single-family homes. That’s neat success story.

 8:33 a.m. Thompson: We’ve done a survey of 660 people shopping for new homes in May and June in California, Nevada, Arizona, Texas, Florida and North Carolina.
  Shoppers were pessimistic about the shape of the economy, but they were way more optimistic about the shape of their own personal finances. Only 31 percent saw their personal income situation as not so good or poor. A lot were in the market because they could get a lot for their money.

74 percent said they were not concerned about hitting the bottom of the market, but they  were still very concerned about losing their job or their spouse losing a job. Sixty-six percent were up to somewhat concerned about job losses. So they don’t want to stretch their finances too much to buy a home. That’s a standard feature of downturns. When it starts rebounding people are really careful about their money. The starter market always comes back first because people feel that’s where they can really get their value.

8:41 a.m: The capital regional market with Hanley Wood’s Sacramento regional sales manager and analyst Kathryn Boyce:
 
Foreclosures: We’re finally down to 11th nationally. We are at least out of the top 10 now. But notices of default are climbing again. Job growth continues to be negative. We’re expecting 41,000 lost jobs in the region in 2009. We rank 58th of 75 job markets nationally for jobs. Our unemployment is projected to go to 12.9 percent by year’s end.

We’re in the middle nationally for population growth. But 27 percent of people coming to the Sacramento area are from the Bay Area. Proximity to the Bay Area is a really good thing for Sacramento. They’re still relatively holding on for equity of their houses. It hasn’t dropped as much as Sacramento so they’re still able to bring some of the equity into Sacramento.

Our housing permit history is way off from 2008 even. We’re down 50 percent. Overall, based on year to date we’re projecting 3,400 sales for 2009. Sacramento can support about 8,500 sales a year. We stole from the future quite a bit from the hey day when we had our special financing. If they had a pulse we gave them a loan. But now Generation Y is coming in. It’s bigger than the Boom generation.
 
 They want to buy a house, but they’re not looking for big 4 BR and 4BA homes. And they’re holding back on marriage and having children.

Most sales here are in the $200-$300K range followed by $300-$400K. There’s an under-abundance of new houses in the $200K and below range. We need to have some houses brought in there. Our median sales price for existing single-family detached homes is $218K. It’s $330 for new single-family houses. We have to stay with that median income. There are no more rebates for California and no special financing. We need rebates or to lower prices.

 Our sales rate: we’re at a dismal 1.5 houses per month. But we’re seeing it increase.
 
We have 1.9 months overall of standing inventory. There’s just not that much standing inventory out there anymore. That’s a great thing…You have 10 months inventory out there total. We’re seeing builders picking up land, we’re seeing Tim Lewis, Meritage, Homes by Towne and K. Hovnanian picking up lots. We’re hearing now again about paper lots having some value.

Cancellations: We’ve had a downward trend. There isn’t a renters mentality any more. Buyers cant come in without a percentage down. The people walking into these subdivisions are committed buyers. They are actually looking for a house.

Our top 10 builders represent half the sales market and only one is a privately-owned builder, JMC.

8:52 a.m.: The existing home market: Boyce: We now have 34.4 percent affordability for new homes and 78 percent affordability for existing homes. It’s a big range there. We’re going to be soft until we lower prices.

The notices of default are coming back and we’re seeing here what might be another huge wave, depending on who you talk to, that there might be another wave of foreclosures coming.

The gap between the median is huge. It’s $189k for single family median for existing.

There are 94,000 lots out there and 18% are finished lots. The bulk of the lots are in Placer, Sacramento and Yuba Counties.
.
Land values: We are having issues with land values. If you add in impact fees from our municipalities it them just right out of whack.. I know the North State Building Industry Association is working with municipalities to lower fees.

Our outlook and conclusion:  We have a potential light in the economy. Demand is still weak, but it is turning. We’ve seen unemployment drop in July, but it’s still up, and its still up higher than other places around the country. The stock market is rebounding. The Fed will continue to buy mortgage-backed securities. But there is still a large overhang of foreclosures and we expect  Sacramento’s mortgage delinquency rate to  be 12.2 percent by the year’s end. California’s could be 14.2 percent by the end of the year.

Finally, it’s  a wild card if the municipalities will lower fees or not. We’ve seen a couple of them doing it, but we’ve seen a couple of them say no. In terms of consumer demand, the first-time home buyer stimulus was a plus. The impact was good for first half of 2009. We’re hearing talk of the National Association of Home Builders going to Congress asking for a $15,000 tax credit for all buyers. That would replace what we have in California because I don’t believe (the state of) California is going to be able to pick up that demand again.

Median price rising toward $200K again in Sacramento County

Monday, September 14th, 2009

August’s median sales price for existing single-family homes rose to $190,000 in Sacramento County and the City of West Sacramento – after three straight months parked at $180,000, the Sacramento Association of Realtors is reporting this afternoon.

That $190,000 figure is 2009’s highest – well up from bottoming out at $167,000 in March.

The median sales price first fell below $200,000 in August, 2008.

The higher number almost certainly reflects the continuing fall in the really cheap repo share of this market. Bank repos feel again to 47.6 percent of sales, while short sales – in which a bank accepts less than owed to avoid costs of foreclosing – went up again to 18.8 percent of sales.

That makes “distress sales” about two-thirds of all sales.

The number of single-family home sales also fell a bit. August’s 1,683 closed escrows were down 8.9 percent from 1,848 in July – and are down 10 percent from 1,871 the same month last year.

 

 Here is the  summary of statistics.

 

And here is a look by ZIP Code.

California bill would extend tax credit on new homes

Thursday, September 10th, 2009

A popular state tax credit of up to $10,000 that helped sell hundreds of new houses throughout the Sacramento region earlier this year appears to be coming back.

A plan to extend the state tax credit to another 4,285 buyers of new, unoccupied homes in California – possibly as many as 500 in the capital area – is expected to receive a vote in the Legislature by Friday’s end of the session.

The buyer tax credit began March 1 and unexpectedly sold out by July 2 as many first-time California buyers combined the state credit with an $8,000 federal tax credit.

Statewide, Roseville ranked eighth among cities where new house buyers received the state credit. Sacramento ranked ninth, the state Franchise Tax Board reported.

“It was used very extensively,” said Dennis Rogers, a government affairs executive with the Roseville-based North State Building Industry Association. He and others in Sacramento’s struggling building industry said the credit helped prod buyers off the fence before it ended in July.

“We’ve definitely seen a lot of interest from homebuyers coming into the sales environment because of the program,” said Pulte Homes spokeswoman Jacque Petroulakis. Pulte is the capital region’s largest home builder.

The original tax credit also helped area builders clear an excess inventory of homes finished or nearly finished, but not yet sold.

Builders and buyers now in the sales process hope to see the bill pass the Legislature this week and be signed by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger.

That’s considered likely by many close to the legislation. The governor was a force behind the original tax credit, calling it a job generator for the construction industry and larger California economy.

Statewide, 10,659 California buyers got the homebuyer credits, which allowed tax breaks of up to $3,333 per year for three years, the Franchise Tax Board reported Aug. 31. Buyers are expected to be notified by Friday about the amount of credit allocated or denied.

The tax agency stopped taking applications July 2, assuming that it had reached the program’s $100 million limit. Original expectations were that most people could claim the entire $10,000. Then a newer FTB sample of taxpayers approved for the credit based on “their 2007 income tax liabilities, and incorporating 2009 tax law changes” showed most people won’t owe enough state taxes to claim an entire $10,000 credit over three years.

“It’s estimated that most people will get about $7,000,” said FTB spokeswoman Brenda Voet. She said those who qualify for the entire $10,000 will still receive it.

The new FTB liability estimates means an estimated $30 million in credits could go unclaimed under provisions of the original tax credit bill passed in February.

Assembly Bill 765, by Assemblywoman Anna Caballero, D-Salinas, reauthorizes the tax credit under the new estimates. New credits would be available upon the bill’s signing and run through March 1, 2010. Builders must apply on behalf of buyers within one week of closing escrow.

The new bill, however, won’t help capital-area buyers who closed escrow after the FTB’s July 2 deadline. They’ll be ineligible for the tax break because they closed escrow during a time when the law, if it passes, was not in effect.

When the housing crash ends, how will Sacramento grow?

Sunday, August 30th, 2009

Some day this housing crash will end. Judging from history, Sacramento’s ranks of developers will snap right back into growth mode – building a fresh wave of new homes.

The big question: Will this new wave of growth create a more urban, compact Sacramento, as many community activists and politicians hope? Or will it follow the time-tested pattern of past booms in the late 1970s, the second half of the 1980s and the first half of this decade, pushing ever-larger homes farther into farmland?

Perhaps it’s easiest to expect more of the same. Suburban development has for decades been Sacramento’s main growth industry, aside from state government.

During this decade’s housing boom, builders constructed 156,000 homes, condos and apartments in the Sacramento region – largely on empty land in suburban cities. Much of this last wave of housing on former farmland has proved especially vulnerable to shredded values and foreclosures – a fate far less common in established neighborhoods closer to jobs.

Still, signs of change were starting to emerge even before the housing market fell apart. Loft-style housing projects were popping up all over Sacramento’s central city. And construction had begun on two 53-story condominium towers on Capitol Mall.

So might visions of mid- and high-rise living in downtown Sacramento take off where they left off – just as it seemed the city was reaching a new level?

Looking ahead, analysts believe the next wave of residential growth in the Sacramento region – perhaps still several years off – might be different. It’s likely to roll in with expensive gasoline, higher home energy costs and lenders’ continued insistence on tight credit.

State and federal policies governing the flow of public money increasingly favor more compact, transit-friendly types of development. And as baby boomers age, they are expected to move down to smaller housing units.

All these forces could mean more people in the next wave of growth will live in smaller homes, and more may live downtown. But no one should underestimate the ethos of the Central Valley: People here like yards and space.

Deeper Sacramento housing crisis is forecast

Thursday, August 27th, 2009

A major credit reporting company predicts mortgage delinquency rates will continue rising in the Sacramento area – with 12 percent of homeowners falling at least two months behind on their payments by year’s end.

That’s nearly twice the national projection and a dramatic jump from just two years ago, when less than 2 percent percent of area homeowners’ notes were delinquent.

California faces some challenges, and that’s reflected in the statistics,” said Ezra Becker, director of consulting and strategy at TransUnion, one of the nation’s three large credit reporting agencies.

“There are serious delinquency rates in California, and it’s not out of the woods by the end of the year,” Becker added. He predicted the delinquency rates in California would begin falling in 2010.

TransUnion, based in Chicago, analyzed trends in the mortgage industry for the second quarter and offered year-end projections for the Sacramento market and the state.

Today, Sacramento’s 60-day mortgage loan delinquency rate – the percentage of homeowners at least 60 days behind on their mortgage payments – stands at 9.62 percent, just below the state’s rate of 9.7 percent, according to Trans Union.

The national rate, at 5.81 percent, is projected to rise to 6.93 percent by the end of the year.

California trails just Arizona, Florida and Nevada, which has the highest delinquency rate at nearly 14 percent. Delinquency rates are a key indicator because the 60-day threshold is traditionally seen as a step toward foreclosure.

In markets where home values have dropped most sharply, delinquency and foreclosure rates are highest. By that measure, the capital remains in trouble. In June, more than half of Sacramento-area households owed more on their homes than they were worth, First American CoreLogic reported last week.

“As long as that persists, we’ll see delinquencies and foreclosures continue,” said Suzanne O’Keefe, an economics professor at California State University, Sacramento. “Until the housing market turns around, there’s not much hope for those rates to reverse.”

By the end of the year, TransUnion predicts, 12.2 percent of Sacramento-area homeowners and more than 14 percent of homeowners statewide will be at least two months behind on their house payments.

Double-digit percentage unemployment and unpaid furlough days are increasingly catching up with homeowners who have “safe” fixed-rate loans, rather than the subprime loans that initially sparked the housing crisis.

Mike Himes, director of NeighborWorks Homeownership Center in Sacramento, which counsels struggling and first-time homeowners, said his office is seeing more clients facing growing debt and making choices between house payments and other expenses. His clientele includes a growing number of state workers whose paychecks have been pared by unpaid furloughs.

“There’s a lot of money borrowed to stay in the house and keep up with living expenses,” Himes said. “This is becoming more and more of a problem.”

Despite the current darkness, Becker of TransUnion predicted the clouds could lift in 2010. And when they do, the sun will shine more brightly on the Golden State than the rest of the nation. TransUnion predicts that the delinquency rate will fall three times faster than in the nation as a whole.

“We anticipate the recovery will be more robust and last longer” than in other regions of the country, he said.

Own-ward Bound?

Wednesday, August 26th, 2009

Real estate illo

Four years ago, Michael Choe appeared in the pages of this magazine for doing something spectacular: choosing to be a renter. At a time when real estate riches were Topic A (“Home $weet Home,” read the TIME cover line), the engineer, from Sacramento, Calif., decided to sell his house and move with his wife and baby boy into a rental. “Compared to owning, rent is cheap,” he said back then.

Exceedingly smart move. Since the summer of 2005, house prices in Sacramento have plummeted by half. Choe and his family — which now includes a second son — watched from the sidelines until the end of last year. That’s when the Choes moved back into a home of their own, a four-bedroom they plucked out of foreclosure at a 35% discount from what it had sold for two years earlier. (See pictures of Americans in their homes.)

Is this smart move No. 2? In other words: Is it really time to buy?

As the housing bubble inflated, the math increasingly favored renting. House prices went up and up while rents stayed relatively flat, meaning you could get a lot more bang for your buck by choosing a lease over a deed. Now, with the housing market in a pulp, the tables are turning. Choe’s most recent rental cost him $1,500 a month. His new mortgage payment, for a same-size house, is $1,570 (after a 20% down payment). “Not a bad deal,” he says — especially considering that once Choe takes into account the money he saves on taxes by deducting his mortgage interest, his new payment is actually a couple of hundred bucks a month less.

Sure, it’s easy to toss around reasons it’s always better to be a homeowner (that mortgage-interest deduction) or it’s always better to be a renter (no property taxes, and who wants to fix his own garbage disposal?). The more complicated truth is that at certain times it makes more sense to be one or the other. (See high-end homes that won’t sell.)

July sees rise in home sales

Tuesday, August 25th, 2009

Home sales increased 12 percent in July in California compared with the same period a year ago, while the median price of an existing home declined 19.6 percent, the California Association of Realtors reported today.

It marked the 11th straight month that existing home sales in California outperformed sales in the year-ago period, and the fifth straight month of rising median prices.

“The federal tax credit for first-time buyers played a critical role in the purchase decision of many buyers,” said James Liptak, CAR president. “Nearly 40 percent of first-time buyers said they would not have purchased a home if the tax credit was not offered.”

CAR said closed escrow sales of existing single-family homes in California totaled 553,910 in July at a seasonally adjusted annualized rate, up from 494,390 in July 2008. The statewide sales figure represents what the total number of homes sold during 2009 would be if sales maintained the July pace throughout the year. It is adjusted to account for seasonal factors that typically influence home sales.

The median home price in California in July was $285,480, down from $355,000 in July last year, but up from $274,740 in June.

In the Sacramento region, CAR said the median home price in July was $183,840, down 16.1 percent from a year ago. CAR said July home sales in the region were down 6.7 percent from a year ago, but up 6 percent over June this year.

Sacramento’s July home sales mark a 2009 high

Monday, August 24th, 2009

Sacramento-area sales of new and existing homes reached a 2009 high in July as 3,815 buyers closed escrow, researcher MDA DataQuick reported this morning.

The sales tally included 3,495 existing homes and 320 new homes in Amador, El Dorado, Nevada, Placer, Sacramento, Sutter, Yolo and Yuba counties, according to the La Jolla-based researcher. Six of every 10 closed escrows were in Sacramento County, said DataQuick.

July sales beat June’s 3,758 total. But it was well below 4,126 closings in July 2008.

It’s the second straight month that sales have fallen below last year, when a massive supply of discounted bank repos fueled a sharp uptick in sales to first-time buyers and investors. The share of repo sales, which exceeded 70 percent early this year, fell below half in Sacramento County in July, according to the Sacramento Association of Realtors.

A dwindling share of repos drove up the county’s median price again in July to $180,000, DataQuick reported. That’s after two months holding steady at $175,000.

More significantly, the rate of year-over-year price declines greatly slowed again in July in Sacramento County, with prices 14.3 percent below the same time last year. For much of the past two years Sacramento County’s median prices – where half the homes sell for more and half for less – have slipped 30 percent or more from the same time a year earlier.

Regional highlights from DataQuick for new and existing homes combined:

Sacramento County reported 2,318 sales, up from 2,284 in June. The $180,000 median price compared to $210,000 in June 2008.

Placer County reported 617 sales, up from 598 in June. The county’s median sales price of $295,500 was down 14.3 percent from $345,000 last year.

El Dorado County’s 237 sales were up from 218 in June. Its median price, $330,000 was down 15.4 percent from $390,000 in July 2008.

• Yolo County’s 240 sales were up from 225 in June. The county’s $281,500 median price was down 3.9 percent from $293,000 the same time last year.

Sutter County reported 110 sales, down from 123 in June. The county’s $160,000 median price was down 21.2 percent from last year’s $203,000.

• Yuba County’s 113 sales were also down from 136 in June. The $155,000 median price was down 15.5 percent from $183,500 in July 2008.

Nevada County reported 151 closed escrows, up from 143 in June. The county’s median sales price, $320,000, was down 14.1 percent from $372,500 the same time last year.

Amador County’s 29 sales were down from 31 in June. Its $197,250 median price was down 32.6 percent from $292,750 in July 2008.

Regionally, the number of for-sale signs also fell for a 23rd straight month in El Dorado, Placer, Sacramento and Yolo counties after peaking at 16,262 in Aug. 2007. Sacramento-based researcher TrendGraphix reported 6,572 homes on the market in the four counties as July ended, the fewest in four years.

TrendGraphix said 14 percent of the for-sale signs were tied to bank repos and 27 percent to buyers seeking short sales, where banks accept less than owed to avoid the higher costs of foreclosing.

The real estate service Trulia also reported this week that 27 percent of Sacramento-area listings have cut prices, with the average drop being 11 percent.

July Home Sales

Monday, August 24th, 2009

6B22HOMESALES_C

Investor Report: Defaulted Mortgage Notes

Friday, August 21st, 2009

A recent deal near Sacramento, California, illustrates a key strategy many investors are following in the distressed real estate field: They’re opting to buy defaulted mortgage notes on projects from banks rather than the real estate itself.

Months later they take full control of the property by foreclosing on it as the noteholder, often yielding a much lower total acquisition price than they’d have gotten in a competitive public foreclosure proceeding.

Earlier this month, real estate investment firm PCCP LLC, formerly known as Pacific Coast Capital Partners, took over a 25-acre new housing community called Folsom Treehouse, in Folsom, California.

The development has 291 finished lots, 99 single family lots, 164 condo lots and 28 constructed or partially built houses.

Folsom Treehouse’s original developer defaulted on a $22.5 million loan in late 2008. Last March, PCCP bought a discounted note on the project from United Commercial Bank and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.

The size of the discount to PCCP was not made public, but in purchases of severely distressed notes, the price can go to 50 cents on the dollar — even less, depending upon the circumstances.

If the discount was 50 percent in this case, for example, the investor might have gotten effective control of property that had originally been valuated at well over $22 million for less than half that price.

PCCP did not return phone calls from Realty Times seeking clarification on what it paid, but in a statement Jim Galovan, a vice president for the firm, said the deal typified the company’s opportunistic approach.

Three thousand miles to the east in New York City, where growing numbers of residential and commercial building owners are defaulting on loans and seeing property values plummet, savvy investors are pursuing a similar strategy.

Developer and investor Ed Mermelstein says multifamily properties, especially newly or partially built new condos, are in serious distress.

Lenders are faced with a terrible choice: Either hang on to a nonperforming note on a building declining in value, OR listen to investors like Mermelstein who’ll offer to take the note off their hands for a deeply- discounted price, all cash, in thirty days.

Banks slowly but surely are becoming more receptive, Mermelstein told Realty Times last week.

But how do you find deals with potentially big discounts and know the right moment to approach banks stuck with nonperforming paper?

“You’ve got to know people who’s business it is to know,” he said, especially brokers, lawyers and lenders who are hardwired into the local market, and know who’s in pain.