Blog

Posts Tagged ‘California’

CA Senate votes to extend $10K tax credit for new-home buyers

Wednesday, October 14th, 2009

Shortly after noon today, the California State Senate voted 35-1 to extend a popular $10,000 tax credit for buyers of new unoccupied homes in California to another 4,300 buyers. It goes back to the Assembly now for a second vote. But the near-unanimous approval of the idea – heavily favored all year by the Legislature – gives it a good shot. The governor has also long liked the tax credit as a boost for the construction sector of the economy.

The bill had long been carried by Assemblywoman Anna Caballero,  D-Salinas, as AB765. But as part of budget machinations in the Senate, it was folded into SBX3 37 with Sen. Roy Ashburn, R-Bakersfield as the new author and Caballero as a co-author.

Essentially the legislation, if it clears all the hurdles and receives final approval, will start the clock running again and giving people who close escrow on new unoccupied homes after its effective date a shot at receiving the credit – up to $10,0000 over three years.
 
But it shuts out people who have closed escrow since the Franchise Tax Board cut off applications on July 2. Already, more than 10,600 California buyers have been approved to get the cut.

 Home builders called it a key sales tool during the spring and summer – and cited its absence as a key reason for slumping sales during the third quarter.

California selling buildings worth $2 billion to raise cash

Thursday, September 24th, 2009

 

As the California economy roared in the 1990s and tax revenues poured into a treasury overseen by Gov. Pete Wilson, the state laid plans for a series of new office buildings in Sacramento to spare itself from paying rent to other landlords.

Barely a decade later, the Schwarzenegger administration is launching a process to sell many of the same buildings that were originally touted as long-term money savers for taxpayers. The goal today is more immediate: pay off debt and steer cash into the state’s depleted general fund. It’s among a variety of short-term crisis solutions that include selling surplus state property, moves also being undertaken in cash-strapped Arizona.

In California, 11 state-owned sites with an estimated value of almost $2 billion will be listed for sale in early 2010 to pay off about $1.4 billion in bonds and net another $600 million “to support other critical state government programs,” said state Department of General Services spokesman Eric Lamoureux.

The state wouldn’t move out of the buildings; it would continue to lease them from the new owners.

The sell-off has lit up the skies for brokers in an otherwise downcast office real estate sector, where few buildings are being bought, sold or even listed, especially in Sacramento. It’s likewise called fresh attention to the state’s battered finances and stirred banter about whether it’s smart to sell long-term real estate assets for short-term goals in a weak market.

Many in the real estate industry acknowledge it’s a close call, but believe “beautiful class A” state buildings with a single tenant will command premium prices.

“It’s unfortunate they would sell them. But they definitely have a need for financing right now, for equity to solve this budget crisis,” said Tom Aguer, president of Sacramento-based commercial real estate brokers Aguer Havelock Associates. “It’s a very creative way for them to fix their problem. But in the long term, these are great assets.”

Brokers like Aguer and others among the nation’s leading real estate firms are already assembling proposals and lining up national teams to broker the sales. The state is demanding an experienced partner: a firm that has done five separate deals of $20 million or more in the past seven years, and at least $150 million in total deals in that span.

No one can calculate for certain the fees such a deal could bring a brokerage firm. But it’s widely said in the industry that the higher the price, the lower the commission. Even a commission as low as one-quarter of 1 percent of almost $2 billion in sales could net a firm nearly $5 million.

Specifically, the state is proposing a so-called “sale/leaseback” deal in which buyers of state buildings would rent them to the state afterward.

“We intend to maintain 100 percent occupancy in the buildings just as we have today,” said Lamoureux, whose department manages state buildings. “We’re just looking to sell the property and lease back over an extended term, probably along the line of 20 years or so.”

Brokers say the lease-back provision is likely to stir interest among risk-averse investors known in the trade as “coupon clippers.” Those are big institutional investors such as pension funds and insurance companies.

“There are numerous buyers looking for single-tenant buildings with the long-term leases. It’s a steady income. It’s a low-risk deal,” said Nico Coulouras, vice president in Sacramento for Lowe Enterprises, a Los Angeles-based development and investment firm.

Among the state complexes proposed for sale are some of Sacramento’s biggest buildings and most distinctive landmarks: downtown’s massive East End Complex next to Capitol Park, finished in 2003; the 17-story Attorney General Building on I Street, completed in 1995; and the sprawling 1.8 million-square-foot campus of the Franchise Tax Board, expanded earlier this decade at the city’s eastern edge.

Elsewhere, fixtures of the Oakland, San Francisco and Los Angeles skylines – bearing names of politicians from Ronald Reagan to Hiram Johnson – will also be sold.

California bill would extend tax credit on new homes

Thursday, September 10th, 2009

A popular state tax credit of up to $10,000 that helped sell hundreds of new houses throughout the Sacramento region earlier this year appears to be coming back.

A plan to extend the state tax credit to another 4,285 buyers of new, unoccupied homes in California – possibly as many as 500 in the capital area – is expected to receive a vote in the Legislature by Friday’s end of the session.

The buyer tax credit began March 1 and unexpectedly sold out by July 2 as many first-time California buyers combined the state credit with an $8,000 federal tax credit.

Statewide, Roseville ranked eighth among cities where new house buyers received the state credit. Sacramento ranked ninth, the state Franchise Tax Board reported.

“It was used very extensively,” said Dennis Rogers, a government affairs executive with the Roseville-based North State Building Industry Association. He and others in Sacramento’s struggling building industry said the credit helped prod buyers off the fence before it ended in July.

“We’ve definitely seen a lot of interest from homebuyers coming into the sales environment because of the program,” said Pulte Homes spokeswoman Jacque Petroulakis. Pulte is the capital region’s largest home builder.

The original tax credit also helped area builders clear an excess inventory of homes finished or nearly finished, but not yet sold.

Builders and buyers now in the sales process hope to see the bill pass the Legislature this week and be signed by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger.

That’s considered likely by many close to the legislation. The governor was a force behind the original tax credit, calling it a job generator for the construction industry and larger California economy.

Statewide, 10,659 California buyers got the homebuyer credits, which allowed tax breaks of up to $3,333 per year for three years, the Franchise Tax Board reported Aug. 31. Buyers are expected to be notified by Friday about the amount of credit allocated or denied.

The tax agency stopped taking applications July 2, assuming that it had reached the program’s $100 million limit. Original expectations were that most people could claim the entire $10,000. Then a newer FTB sample of taxpayers approved for the credit based on “their 2007 income tax liabilities, and incorporating 2009 tax law changes” showed most people won’t owe enough state taxes to claim an entire $10,000 credit over three years.

“It’s estimated that most people will get about $7,000,” said FTB spokeswoman Brenda Voet. She said those who qualify for the entire $10,000 will still receive it.

The new FTB liability estimates means an estimated $30 million in credits could go unclaimed under provisions of the original tax credit bill passed in February.

Assembly Bill 765, by Assemblywoman Anna Caballero, D-Salinas, reauthorizes the tax credit under the new estimates. New credits would be available upon the bill’s signing and run through March 1, 2010. Builders must apply on behalf of buyers within one week of closing escrow.

The new bill, however, won’t help capital-area buyers who closed escrow after the FTB’s July 2 deadline. They’ll be ineligible for the tax break because they closed escrow during a time when the law, if it passes, was not in effect.

July sees rise in home sales

Tuesday, August 25th, 2009

Home sales increased 12 percent in July in California compared with the same period a year ago, while the median price of an existing home declined 19.6 percent, the California Association of Realtors reported today.

It marked the 11th straight month that existing home sales in California outperformed sales in the year-ago period, and the fifth straight month of rising median prices.

“The federal tax credit for first-time buyers played a critical role in the purchase decision of many buyers,” said James Liptak, CAR president. “Nearly 40 percent of first-time buyers said they would not have purchased a home if the tax credit was not offered.”

CAR said closed escrow sales of existing single-family homes in California totaled 553,910 in July at a seasonally adjusted annualized rate, up from 494,390 in July 2008. The statewide sales figure represents what the total number of homes sold during 2009 would be if sales maintained the July pace throughout the year. It is adjusted to account for seasonal factors that typically influence home sales.

The median home price in California in July was $285,480, down from $355,000 in July last year, but up from $274,740 in June.

In the Sacramento region, CAR said the median home price in July was $183,840, down 16.1 percent from a year ago. CAR said July home sales in the region were down 6.7 percent from a year ago, but up 6 percent over June this year.

Sacramento-area home sales remain sluggish

Monday, August 24th, 2009

Sales of existing homes in the Sacramento area climbed 2.6 percent from June to July – far short of the surprising 7.2 percent rise nationally that sent stocks soaring Friday.

A July report showed sales of 3,495 existing homes in Amador, El Dorado, Nevada, Placer, Sacramento, Sutter, Yolo and Yuba counties, according to San Diego-based researcher MDA DataQuick.

Buyers also closed escrow on 320 new homes to push July’s regional sales tally to 3,815, up slightly from 3,758 in June.

The rise failed by a long shot to match the U.S. sales increase from June to July. The National Association of Realtors called it the fastest monthly gain since 1999 and a sign that the market “has decisively turned for the better.”

In the capital region, however, where the housing market is struggling to regain its footing, this year’s July sales were lower than the 4,126 sales reported in July 2008. By comparison, there were 2,906 area sales in July 2007 and 3,275 in July 2006. In July 2005: 6,159.

July marked the second straight month in which sales dipped below the same time a year ago. Last year a massive supply of bank repos fueled a sales boom by first-time buyers and investors. The boom has faded as repos fell to 58.7 percent of July sales, the lowest share in 15 months, DataQuick reported.

A dwindling supply of cheap repos drove Sacramento County’s median price higher – to $180,000 – in July, DataQuick reported. That’s after two months at $175,000, and well up from February’s low of $160,000 in a county that’s home to about six in 10 of the area’s home sales.

DataQuick said 38 percent of Sacramento County sales were below $150,000. Homes priced at $400,000 and higher were 6.6 percent of July sales.

Significantly, the rate of year-over-year price declines slowed in Sacramento County. July prices were 14.3 percent below July 2008. For much of the past two years Sacramento County’s median price – where half of homes sell for more and half for less – slipped 30 percent or more from the same month a year earlier.

“We’re coming off that period when we had the steepest slides,” said DataQuick analyst Andrew LePage. “It’s going to get easier and easier to get to single-digit decline from a year ago unless we see foreclosures and job losses ratchet up.”

Foreclosures in the region, indeed, rose in the second quarter of 2009. The unemployment rate in the region has climbed to 11.8 percent and to a record 11.9 percent in California, the state reported.

July’s median sales prices in Sacramento County are back to what they were in September 2001. Then, the county’s median household income was $44,928, according to Claritas, a demographic research company. Today, it’s $57,847, suggesting a market again well matched with incomes and even overcorrecting after its housing boom excesses.

Prices are back to October 2002 levels in Placer and Sutter counties and mid-2003 in El Dorado, Yolo and Yuba counties.

“It’s affordable by all our natural price measures,” said Dean Wehrli, a Sacramento executive with San Diego-based Sullivan Group Real Estate Advisors. “I would say we’re in the middle of the overcorrection.”

Wehrli said today’s median price for existing homes in Sacramento County is about the same as if the boom had not occurred and prices rose 3.4 percent a year since 2000.

But it’s still not easy to buy, complain first-timers trying to snag bargains.

“I’ve been in this since March. I’ve been outbid. I’m bidding $30,000 over the asking price. And still, cash just walked in and took it,” said Dianna Starr of Sacramento. “People I know say it’s a buyer’s market. No, it’s not.”

Starr, outbid by investors on several foreclosed homes in the $135,000 range is trying now to buy a short sale listing. That’s an equally frustrating problem for buyers.

In short sales, a bank agrees to a sales price below what it’s owed on the house. Complications abound.

Starr said in her case the main mortgage lender wants to sell, but lender JPMorgan Chase has balked at taking a loss on a home equity line of credit.

“I’m doing everything I can,” said the medical transcriptionist at Solano State Prison. “I’m a hard-working person that can’t catch a break.”

Regionally, the number of for-sale signs in El Dorado, Placer, Sacramento and Yolo counties fell for a 23rd month. Sacramento researcher TrendGraphix reported 6,572 homes on the market in the four counties as July ended, the fewest in four years.