Blog

Archive for the ‘Real Estate News’ Category

The World’s Most Expensive Homes – 2010 (Billionaire Homes)

Thursday, April 28th, 2011

 Back in 2008, a website called www.overseaspropertymall.com  published the 10 most expensive homes in the world – 2008, they thought it would be a good idea to have a 2010 update of the list and so you can see how they compare for yourself. Anyway, here we go:

1. “Antilla”, Mumbai – $1billion

The world’s most expensive home in 2010 is unquestionable. It is the first $1 billion home the world has seen. A custom-build 27 story towering mansion, Antilla in Mumbai is the home of the world’s fifth richest man, namely Mukesh Ambani, head of Indian petro-chemical giant Reliance Industries, which is India’s most valuable firm by market capitalization.

With double height ceilings, ballrooms, crystal chandelier ceilings, retractable stages, and 600 servants, there is no other home on earth that compares to the 570 feet tall Antilla.

2. Villa Leopolda, Cote d’Azur France – $525 million.

 Villa Leopolda is an 80,000 square foot Chateuau built in 1902 by King Leopold II of Belgium. The villa has been rumoured to be the home of Bill Gates and many more global figures, but has actually been home to French banker Edmond Safira, whose wife Lily still lives there. The 19 bedroom villa, which boasts sports courts, a bowling alley, multiple kitchens, dining rooms and a movie theatre, received even more press lately when a Russian mogul lost his deposit on the property when he reneged on completing the sale.

3. One Hyde Park – The Penthouse, London – $200 million

 

This massively stylish modern penthouse may not be so expensive did it not sit atop the famous number 1 Hyde Park address. As it is in such a premium location it has been built as a home for the rich and famous complete with SAS guard, bullet proof windows, iris scanners, panic rooms and a secret tunnel to the nearby Mandarin Hotel. The building has communal spas, squash courts and wine tasting rooms, and the penthouse is served by 24 hour room service.

4. Fairfield Pond, The Hamptons – $170 million

 This 63 acre home is considered the largest residential compound in America. The 29 bedroom beachfront home of publicity shy billionaire Ira Rennert has 5 sports courts, a bowling alley and a $150,000 hot tub.

5. Hearst Mansion, Beverly Hills – $165 million

This mansion — the former home of publishing giant William Randolph Hearst, the inspiration for the main character in “Citizen Kane” –, features 29 bedrooms and three pools. The estate became a pop-culture icon after being used in The Godfather movie, when the infamous severed horse’s head turned up in the owner’s bed. The fact that assassinated President John F Kennedy stayed in the mansion during his honeymoon also added to its status. The house has some notable neighbours, including Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes and David and Victoria Beckham

6. Franchuk Villa, Kensington – $161million

Anyone else spotting a trend here (the most expensive homes being mainly in the UK and US, this making it 2 all). This Victorian Villa was a girl’s prep school until 1997, when it was bought and upgraded in 2006. After receiving a £10 million overhaul and refurb it was purchased by Ukrainian AIDS philanthropist, Elena Franchuk, and renamed the Franchuk Villa.

7. “The Pinnacle”, Montana – $155million

 

 

This is the home of Time and Edra Blixseth, owners of the billionaires-only golf and ski resort “Yellowstone Club” in Montana. It will be the largest and grandest property on the resort, but is still small in comparison to some of those on this list, with only 10 bedrooms. To catch up the property has impressive features such as every inch of floor being heated, a heated driveway and fireplaces in all bathrooms. (3-2 to America).

8. “The Manor”, Los Angeles – $150 million

The home of Aaron Spelling, dubbed “The Manor” by wife Cindy, has 123 rooms for his family to choose from, an indoor skating rink, multiple pools, three kitchens, sports courts, private orchard, and a bowling alley. The home, which he had built from scratch in 1991 also has a room used exclusively for wrapping presents and an entire floor dedicated to closet space.

9. Updown Court, Windlesham, Surrey – $139million

 

 The description of this home is above, as it was the 3rd most expensive home in 2008. What is interesting however, is that in 2008 it was valued at $110million, meaning its value has grown substantially even during such difficult financial times.

10. Dracula’s Castle, Romania – $135million

This home needs no introduction. Built in the 14th century, the castle is now a national monument and museum thanks to the legend surrounding it, which also needs no introduction. It has 57 rooms in total, including 17 bedrooms filled with antiques and historical artefacts. It wouldn’t do for the publicly shy Ira Rennert mentioned above, but for the quirkier billionaire, the 450 million tourists that visit every year may be worth it for living in Dracula’s castle.

And there you have it folks, now that is what I would call “Prime Real Estate.”

Sacramentans sue lenders to save homes – but very few succeed!

Wednesday, April 27th, 2011

Sacramentans struggling to keep their homes increasingly are suing their lenders for fraud, even though judges rarely rule in their favor.

Desperation has led some of these homeowners to pay thousands of dollars to people who are not lawyers to help prepare their cases. Others hire attorneys in lawsuit mills that aggressively solicit for clients.

“It’s the new scam,” said Tom Layton, an investigator for the State Bar of California.

The number of lawsuits filed by individuals against banks and mortgage companies in the Sacramento region has more than doubled, rising to about 250 in the last six months, up from about 115 from the same period two years ago, according to a Bee review of court records in Sacramento and Placer counties.

Many of the lawsuits are filed by frustrated owners tired of dealing with banks that repeatedly transfer calls or reject loan modifications after a successful trial.

But homeowners don’t always know what they’re getting into when they go to court. Some unscrupulous operators, Layton said, are charging large fees for little work.

The Legislature barred lawyers and non-lawyers alike from charging upfront fees to file a loan modification; however, there is no ban on collecting such fees for preparing a lawsuit.

“Now we’re seeing the loan mod people morph into the sue-your-bank people,” Layton said.

Stephen C. Ruehmann, a Folsom lawyer who has filed dozens of recent lawsuits against lenders, agreed that some people are taking advantage of homeowner desperation. Others, though, are fighting for homeowners who have no other recourse.

“(Banks) don’t have any motivation to change; they’ve already been bailed out,” Ruehmann said.

Local judges, though, have traditionally been resistant to these types of fraud claims. In Sacramento County, 20 of the 24 homeowners who sued their lenders in Superior Court during a six-month period exactly two years ago have since lost their homes, according to court records and Foreclosures.com, a tracking firm.

Thirteen of those homeowners represented themselves in court; twelve of the 13 have lost their homes.

Despite that record, the trend of homeowners representing themselves has accelerated. More than 50 local residents who filed lawsuits during the past six months don’t have counsel.

“It’s a sad situation,” said Lawrence Green, professor of law at the University of California, Davis. “People not represented by a lawyer face a much harder time prevailing.”

Man paid paralegal $5,500

Sacramento resident Charles Ratliff is among those going it alone. He paid a Southern California paralegal $5,500 to prepare a complaint against IndyMac and others.

He filed his complaint in January. A judge denied his request for an order to stop the foreclosure, saying he was unlikely to win his case. The bank repossessed his house in March.

Ratliff said he regrets filing his lawsuit, which has sat dormant since he lost his home. “I fault myself,” he said.

He said he was introduced to the paralegal, Camilla Williams, by Sacramento real estate agent Kathleen Petroff, who was working with him on a short sale.

Petroff said she also introduced another one of her clients, Bay Area resident Clifton Constantine, to Williams, but never vouched for the paralegal’s services. She said she took a one-time payment of $200 from Williams but turned down an offer from Williams to pay her $500 per referral.

“I told them all, ‘It’s your own choice,’ ” Petroff said of her clients.

Reached by phone, Constantine said Williams wanted more than he could afford to prepare a lawsuit against American Home Mortgage Servicing and North American Title Co.

“She said, ‘Cliff, I’ve been praying about this and I want to help you guys,’ ” he said.

Even with an initial discount, Constantine said he wound up paying Williams more than $20,000 for his case in San Francisco Superior Court. The judge issued a preliminary ruling for Constantine’s lenders, but has given him a chance to amend his complaint.

Jim Towery, the State Bar’s chief trial counsel, said people without a law license should not be preparing lawsuits. “It is illegal,” he said. “It falls under the category of the unlicensed practice of law.”

In a brief phone interview, Williams declined to answer questions about her business, including how many clients she has or where she received paralegal training.

“I haven’t done anything illegal,” she said.

When informed of Towery’s comments, Williams said, “I’m not even aware of any law like that.”

While homeowners such as Ratliff and Constantine have tried to fight the banks on their own in court, others have turned to law firms that specialize in such cases.

Sacramento resident Maria Montoya-Cano, for instance, has been paying $1,500 a month to the Roseville-based United Law Center to pursue a fraud case against her lender.

Montoya-Cano, who filed her case in late October, alleges her mortgage officer and bank incorrectly told her the only loan she could get had an adjustable rate. That rate has since reset to an untenable level, she said.

The bank that gave her the loan went under in 2008. Her original mortgage broker said her case lacks merit.

A judge recently ruled against her request for an injunction against the current holders of her loan, saying Montoya-Cano’s case has little chance of success.

So Montoya-Cano has filed for bankruptcy protection to save her home. She’s selling a few rental properties she owns at rock-bottom prices to help pay her legal bills and other debts. She’s also taking care of her ailing mother and preparing for the return of her Marine son from Afghanistan.

“He told me not to worry – that he would find a job and help me out,” she said.

Montoya-Cano said she is happy with United Law Center’s representation. Her lawyer did not return a call for comment. Asked why she continues to pursue her case, Montoya-Cano said, “I’m just not through fighting. We can’t let the banks get away with this.”

False claims usually alleged

Lawsuits against lenders generally are based on the same argument: Banks and mortgage brokers made false claims during the boom, telling borrowers they could easily refinance their loans before interest rates reset, or didn’t disclose the true terms of loans.

The lawsuits often allege that lenders knew these statements were untrue, but were interested in making a quick buck by selling the mortgage on the secondary market.

Some of the lawsuits also allege that banks set conditions for trial loan modifications, then denied those modifications even after borrowers met the conditions.

Legal experts contacted by The Bee said it’s hard to prove fraud claims, even though dubious lending practices were widespread during the real estate boom.

“After all, borrowers typically did sign loan applications, escrow instructions, promissory notes, trust deeds and disclosures,” said Green, the UC Davis law professor.

Another obstacle facing borrowers is that it’s tough to prove a fraud conspiracy between the mortgage brokers, banks and investors.

Even if a bank committed fraud while giving a loan, the investors who bought that loan on the secondary market aren’t liable if they didn’t have direct knowledge of the fraud, said John Sprankling, a professor at the University of the Pacific’s McGeorge School of Law.

And if the loan holders aren’t liable, the homeowner likely doesn’t have a shot of keeping the house.

The response of banks to these lawsuits is often uniform. They say that even if everything in the complaint is true, it doesn’t constitute fraud. They file a request, usually successful, to dismiss the case or deny an injunction keeping the bank from taking a home.

Michael P. Malloy, a McGeorge professor, said judges may be more amenable to fraud lawsuits after a spate of “robo-signing” scandals revealed some lenders’ shoddy foreclosure practices.

“The courts are going to take their time and not treat these cases as routine,” Malloy said.

But, like other legal experts, Malloy cautioned that proving mortgage fraud takes a lot of work, and is tough to do without records outlining false promises.

“If all you have is a batch of paperwork and a vague recollection of what someone said to you, you have a real tough road ahead,” he said.

Sacramento Homes For Sale – Price Drop in Sacramento County

Thursday, March 24th, 2011

Sacramento County home sales hovered around seasonal norms for the second month in a row, but the median price fell again as investors snapped up distressed properties, according to figures released Thursday by market watcher DataQuick Information Systems.
Sales in Sacramento County rose 6.3 percent in February compared to the same month of 2010, the La Jolla-based researcher said. This is the second straight month that sales were up when compared to the prior year. They’re only down about 5 percent from the monthly average of the past two decades.

However, the median price for those sales was $157,000 -the lowest level since September 2000, when the median was $154,000. The median price for resale detached homes was $160,000 -equaling the median in spring 2009, when the full impact of the foreclosure crisis hit the market.
The low median but steady sales are largely the result of investors snapping up distressed assets in foreclosure and short sales, said Andrew LePage, a DataQuick analyst.

“There are so many people out there bargain hunting still,” LePage said.

About 34.7 percent of February sales went to absentee owners — the highest percentage since 2000 when DataQuick started tracking such figures. A record number of buyers — 39 percent — paid cash. That compares to an average of 13.3 percent since 1988.

Tyler Smith & Team Bloopers…… to funny!

Tuesday, February 15th, 2011

I was doing a video for Realtor Magazine 30 under 30 and obviously I continued to mess up…… Well my field inspector made a video blooper of me and my assistant Jennifer. What a crack up, hope you enjoy as much as we did.

This is the remix video he made. Thanks Nate!

We made Top 50 TEAMS in the NATION!!!!!

Tuesday, August 10th, 2010

 For the first 1/2 of the year we were ranked in the top 50 nationwide. We came in at #33 and are very excited. We went down a couple of spots from March-April, so we are pushing to keep that ranking. We have one of the hardest working teams out in the market place!!! Thank you to all of our Buyers, Sellers, and Asset Managers who trusted us!! We a

Tyler Smith % Team make TOP 50 IN THE NATION

re here to serve!!!

Why I work by Referral!!

Thursday, August 5th, 2010

Why I work by referral, Tyler Smith Sacramento

Smith Premier Properties uses SkySlope Real Estate Transaction management software

Monday, July 26th, 2010

United States, July 23, 2010: Sky Slope launches transaction management software for real estate intended for various brokers and real estate dealers in the United States. This real estate software for agents helps in the storage of various transaction documents for transaction management brokers as well. This is a very competitive real estate software for brokers and helps real estate brokers in their day to day business and transactions by providing a secure and protected storage facility.

Sky Slope is smart real estate document management software that helps save transaction files online along with valuable time and money. This software is of great efficacy to a transaction management realtor and they can operate their transactions through this real estate transaction management application

The spokesperson on this occasion says, “Our software helps in transaction management real estate and is an auditor’s dream come true. You will need only a few seconds to access any transaction file and review the documents that you have stored with us. You do not need to search for old files in warehouses. As a broker, you save a high cost of physical space occupied by transaction files through our transaction management software for real estate.”

Sky Slope, transaction management software is simple to use and designed especially for the “not-so-technical” person. Plus, it helps you establish a green office. There is also the additional advantage of online filing and archiving. Sky Slope preserves all correspondence activities and documentation that can be produced as evidence in case of litigation. As an agent, it allows you to stay organized. You can be sitting at home and getting your checks in time by completing your docu`mentation via fax or email or scanned documents.

California Foreclosure Crisis Subsides

Wednesday, May 26th, 2010

Tyler Smith & Team ranked #24 in the Nation

Wednesday, April 14th, 2010

  For the months of January and February we were ranked in the top 50 nationwide. We came in at #24 and are very excited. We have one of the hardest working teams out in the market place!!! Thank you to all of our Buyers, Sellers, and Asset Managers who trusted us!! We are here to serve!!!

Foreclosures’ collateral damage widespread

Friday, February 12th, 2010

If you’re among the thousands of Sacramento-area homeowners who played it conservative during the housing boom, who didn’t refinance or flip to a bigger house, everyone else’s foreclosures reached out and smacked you anyway.

Sales prices are lower. There’s less home equity to tap into. Local services have been shredded by falling property tax revenue.

Such repo collateral damage is why so many owners who pay their mortgages on time are so grouchy.

Rob Wassmer hasn’t been affected so much. Fourteen years ago he bought an east Sacramento house – in the Fab 40s – cheaply at the very bottom of the last housing bust. His older neighborhood has largely escaped the brunt of 52,000 foreclosures across the Sacramento region since 2007.

But Wassmer knows the financial whipping people have taken in Lincoln, Elk Grove, North Highlands and Yuba City. Being an academic, he knew there had to be a number for the carnage.

“I knew this kind of research had been done. I wanted to do a study of Sacramento,” said Wassmer, chairman of California State University, Sacramento’s department of public policy and administration.

Wassmer analyzed $9 billion in sales prices from 36,822 home sales in Sacramento, Yolo, Yuba, Sutter, Placer and El Dorado counties between January 2008 and June 2009. Almost half were homes sold by banks. The other half were sold by regular folks.

He concluded that the foreclosed homes cost this one region of America $2.7 billion in price cuts and lost equity over just 18 months.

• The repos sold for $659 million less simply because they were bank-owned and differed from normal sales. They took $1 billion more in price cuts because they were near other repos.

• Both reductions then stripped $1 billion from sale prices of nearby homes never in foreclosure danger.

Collectively, these foreclosures cost local governments $27.1 million in property taxes. Reassessments will likely take more.

Said Wassmer, “This is a call for regulation.” He suggests a federal law to make lenders and borrowers meet in “structured mediation” at least once before foreclosure.

Few ideas have proved so far to be the solution. See the research directly at: >www.csus.edu/indiv/w/wassmerr/ResForeclosure.pdf